What is the difference between proactive and reactive tna

Gill Staffing can help. Call us today to learn more! Share this:. Proactive vs reactive TNA. Mahbubul Haque. A short summary of this paper. Download PDF. Translate PDF. What is the difference between proactive and reactive TNA? When is proactive better? Proactive TNA is strategic and carefully planned without a definite problem as the focus. Businesses use TNA to determine what actions will produce the best employee performance levels. TNA can be proactive or reactive, and both types employ training to address productivity problems among employees.

A TNA may be performed on a individual employee, a specific department or a entire work force with the purpose of revealing and correcting any weak performance areas. Small businesses need to know what to do when employee troubles arise. However, reactive HR is often regarded as putting out fires and living in HR chaos because managers wait until employee issues come to a head before they try to handle them. By this time, symptoms may have become overwhelming for the business and its employees.

Reactive HR also means adding new policies and procedures in response to problems that arise. The main similarity between proactive and reactive HR is that both are integral in strategic HR, which has become prominent in the early 21st century. Companies need to proactively develop procedures but have an efficient system to deal well when surprise issues occur. Both approaches involve processes of dealing with employees and their concerns.

In each type, HR professionals and managers want to keep employees happy so that production is high.