Which slide scanner is best

Drum scanners? Thanks, Harold for the real life what scanner to buy tip! Some of these comments make my head spin. Would your suggestions of the Epson v or Epson v be the same for scanning old slides and negatives in museum collections? We have a large number of slides and negatives we need to scan to digital that are in our collections, several from long term archaeological projects done in the s to s.

Most of slide film used was Kodachrome. We will be scanning to a new iMac. The Epson v, V or V are great for scanning tons of old slides and film negatives. What I like about the Epson is its Digital Ice technology which automatically removes dust, hair, scratches or other obstructions. The PowerSlide is also good option only for 35mm slide scanning.

It can scan slide by batch up to 50 slides nonstop at a time. It depends on what you mean by large number. You will not get dust removal so you will need to unmount the slides and clean them. It might take a week to unmount and clean slides. Only silverfast studio AI has dust and scratch removal for kodachrome.

Also Kodachrome images will come out blueish unless you use an IT8 target for color. I would spend a week unmounting the slides and cleaning them and then use the dust and scratch removal in photoshop to fix the rest. I have already scanned multiple thousands of 35mm slide scans using a flatbed photo scanner no longer available HP Scanjet G that was many times faster than the work you describe and more than met the needs of my customers.

You might have to actually learn some stuff. Hi, I have the Epson v to scan my 35 mm negatives. Is there a device that does such a thing? Do you mean previewing the negatives? Try the Loupe Magnifiers. Hi, I use the V also. I guess it might be useful if you have hundreds of 35mm negs like I do.

I just look with a loupe on my lightbox and then scan the strip on the V and keep the ones I like. My job: present each family member a CD with pictures and history. Is there a scanner or process that would make this easier?

Any thoughts on which scanner or software that would help me save our family history as Dad intended? Thank you so much. It is actually the software that can append those captions. You can do the caption through Photoshop. I have a chance to pick up the Nikon at a fair price. Thank you. The Epson V is rather advanced than the Nikon Coolscan. The Epson V is not just a film and slide scanner but also a photo and document scanner. Though both use Digital Ice which is a great feature for fixing those scratches on images.

Is there a special insert for metal slide jackets that I can order or do I have to remove each slide from the metal jacket? I also have inherited thousands of slides in jackets and magazines. Above reply mentions removing the jackets which appears to be a tedious exercise.

Any suggestions on how to do it? Whats the real difference in the V and the F? I mean money is not the issue however the resolutions seem about the same. I am going to do a family project of 1, of photos and want the best quality. I was thinking of the FF but that idea is blown out of the water because most photos are in a folder.

The Epson v and v have superb image quality output. What I like about these scanners is its digital ice features which detects and corrects scratches and removes dust on photos. However using the digital ice makes the scanning slow. On the other hand, the F Mark II is also great scanner.

It is simple and easy to use. However the scans are not that excellent but not bad either. In terms of energy efficiency, there is an Epson v which is Energy Star Certified. I have Windows 10 on my laptop. Any advice would be appreciated. What I would recommend is to debug. Uninstall the drivers and try to install it one by one. I have no conflicts between two drivers installed on the same OS. Thanks for that.

Maybe it was just a HP thing. I just tried and returned the Jumbl 22MP. I got it to replace an older Jumbl 5 MP, hoping for better resolution. The new Jumbl often got colors badly wrong — yellow or green in excess. The older Jumbl scanned the same negatives without problems.

The 5MP Jumbl is fast and easy. The Jumble 22MP was a disappointment — perhaps I just got a bad unit. I have an old Konica-Minolta Dimage scanner, however that software is no longer supported and does not work in Windows.

It is also a very slow slide scanner. Have you tried to clean the lens of Jumbl 22MP or the films you want to scan? You can preview the image first and adjust the color and exposure. Regarding with batch slide scanning, the PowerSlide is a good option while Wolverine F2D Mighty 20MP 7-in-1 or is a good for fast 35mm film scanning. I usually choose the autofeed scanners rather than flatbed when scanning hundreds of films. Is there another scanner that will do batch?

You will be amazed by its scanning speed but the output is not good. I use the autofeed scanners when scanning multiple films and slides. The PowerSlide is by far the best option for batch scanning. Can you recommend a stand alone scanner for photos? I am trying to digitize a photo collection for my hometown Historical Society and would like higher res stand alone photo scanning on site that I can clean up later on my computer.

Hi, I will be starting a project of scanning thousands of family 35mm negatives and slides. I am in the market for a high end scanner that has an output that allows for image manipulation in Adobe CC. Should I be looking for a scanner that produces RAW files? What would you suggest? Do you need fast scanning method or just the typical flatbed or auto fed scanners?

This limits you to a few options. Plustek makes OK scanners, the Pacific Image PrimeFilmXA is a few notches higher output—it deals with darker slides better and has adjustable focus. Upgrade to silverfast AI studio. It makes a difference in output as it allows focusing for the Pacific Image and also produces high bit raw files. Get your negatives perfectly flat. Lay heavy books on top of them for several weeks to flatten the film.

Sort your slides by type-kodachrome, ektachrome, fujichrome, etc. Buy an IT8 target slide for better color-and use the auto calibrate function in Silverfast.

Each particular scanner will produce slightly different color. DO not use infrared dust removal for kodachrome slides-it does not work properly. Buy a fast computer with a large SSD drive. Silverfast produces very large RAW files mbmb a piece. I have , lots, maybe thousands of photos and negatives, and some slides that I want to digitize. I am not too concern about resolution. Enough for uploading to Facebook or view online. Speed is of the essence, or my key concern.

I think I probably have negatives for my print photos. Hence, if I can get something that can scan negatives and slides quickly, that is good enough for me. Ideally something that can feed negative strips quickly. If that can load on its own in batches without me watching over it, all the more better. I have read the above reviews quickly but am unsure which meets the above criteria. Thanks for any advice. Both are fast scanners.

I would like to have a scanner which produces good colours and is fast, which one would you recommend? However, there is also options to adjust color and exposure like the Jumbl 22MP. On the other hand, beautiful scanned images are not created just through scanning directly but there are software to optimize the color, saturation, exposure etc.

So much choice and so many mixed reviews! I have Windows 10 now. The Epson v is a great choice if you want it to be connected to your computer. However, if you want a stand alone that requires no computer connection, the Jumbl 22MP or Wolverine F2D are the best, for entry to mid level at least. It is brand new — never used.

Do you know anything about it? I am using a 64mb SC card but it keeps telling me the memory card is full when the card is empty.

An impressive, all-in-one film and slide scanner, Magnasonic rolls important features in one lightweight package to meet your basic scanning needs. Magnasonic relives old memories at half the price and half the size of equally-competent models.

With a solid build at 0. Its display screen is quite small at 2. You can also view your scanned image through its TV-out option, but there will be changes in the image quality of your previews dependent on your display size. Additionally, it has a built-in storage of up to MB, which basically means that you can save up to images on this unit alone. It also has an SD card slot if you need to make room for more files.

Loaded with basic scanning features, this slide scanner does a decent job in scanning 35mm films and slides. Got rolls of old 35 mm films or slides? Zonoz FS-One is here to offer you a practical way to put your images back into the spotlight.

Inarguably one of the cheapest slide scanners to date, the FS-One is a stand-alone device that allows you to make basic editing functions through its built-in software. Aside from making adjustments on scanning brightness and resolution, you can also mirror and flip your images for better image outputs.

No external software or computer is needed for this slide scanner. You can scan and convert your films and slides into 22 MP images in just a matter of seconds. Considering its price point, this is a pretty solid device that can get your slides digitized in no time. But if you have a bulk of decade-old films sitting on your shelf that just need a revamp, the FS-One is a great, cost-efficient slide scanner that can instantly revitalize your slides.

With just a single tap, you can easily scan your films and slides even without any additional software. This small slide scanner is sure to impress with its operational efficiency.

The Kodak Scanza is a great device that keeps your scans rolling out without the need for additional software. Instead of scanning, it shoots film frames with either an interpolated 22 MP or an optional 14 MP image resolution. Just one click and it scans and saves your images directly to an SD card. A five-star device for user-friendliness, the Kodak Scanza allows image previews via a 3.

Along with its tilting monitor are film holders compatible with 35 mm, mm, mm, 8mm, and Super 8 film and slide types. The downside: its 35 mm film holder only has one frame cutout. Since you need to manually feed your film through its holder, your film is vulnerable to dust and fingermarks, which can affect your scanned output. Not only do some of its outputs lack detail, but it can also produce overprocessed scans with black and white spaces. True to its name, the ClearClick QuickConvert 2.

What really seals the deal with this slide scanner is its storage capacity. Despite its budget-friendly price, it supports—and includes —an 8GB memory card, which can store up to images. So if you have a drawer full of films and slides, the ClearClick QuickConvert can give you more than enough storage capacity to get your images saved digitally.

Plus, you can even scan old photos without having to remove them from your album. This, along with its battery-operated option, makes it a great pick if you need to do uninterrupted scanning work. Despite all these amazing features, one thing that pulls this device down is its image resolution.

Essentially it holds your film flat against a translucent diffuser, allowing you to evenly distribute light across the film plane for a smooth, even scan. As mentioned, a lightbox is the best choice for light source, though if you're in a tight spot pretty much anything will do, from a bedside lamp to a tablet with its screen brightness turned all the way up.

Pixl-latr offers a number of 3D-printed parts for helping you get the most out of the product, such as holders designed specifically for certain sizes of slide. You'll get best results from a macro lens, but again, if you don't have one, a decent mm will work. It's not the fastest way to scan film, and if you have a lot of rolls to process, you might want something a bit snappier. We couldn't have a list of the best film scanners without including Plustek's flagship 8-series model, the i Ai.

It looks identical to the cheaper i SE at 2 , and for the most part it is indeed the same scanner, which means you get the same clever infra-red dust detection and removal tech, as well as top-notch scanning qualiy. This packs pro-grade scanning customisation features like a bit histogram for a clearer, more true-to-life preview of scan quality. There's also an Expert Mode if you want to spend a little extra time fine tuning scan quality settings or apply protecting layers.

The Ai Studio software even includes an IT8 color calibration target to ensure colors in the digital scan preview, the scan itself and a print of that scan all match each other.

Naturally, these extra features command a significant price premium over the i SE, so if you don't intend to delve into advanced scanning settings each time you wan to digitize some negs or slides, the extra outlay is tough to justify. However, if you really want to ensure those cherished memories are scanned as perfectly as possible, and you've got the time to do the necessary fine tuning, the OpticFilm i AI could be for you.

Flatbed scanners are traditionally thought of as a more versatile but less finessed alternative to a dedicated film scanner. However, the V is impressively designed to cater to film photographers. Scanning resolution can go as high as a whopping 12,dpi, but you'll likely find 3,dpi more than enough for your film stocks, producing a digitized image equivalent to around You might imagine that laying out up to a dozen 35mm film frames over the flatbed would result in fast scanning, but the V Photo still scans each frame individually — albeit automatically — and takes around one minute per frame at 3,dpi.

Scanning with Digital ICE automatic dust and scratch removal enabled only adds around 20 seconds per frame. Results are superior to the Plustek OpticFilm dedicated film scanner, with noticeably more detail, plus better default color and contrast. Its eye-opening price tag is a result of a dedicated scanning lens designed especially for film, and it being bundled with not one but two sets of film holders.

The 35mm film strip and 35mm slide holders are an appreciable step up in quality from those included with the V Photo. The scanner itself is also an absolute beast and feels like a premium product. At 3,dpi, the V does not perform significantly faster than the V, but step up to higher resolutions and this top-tier model pulls ahead, taking just 2 minutes 30 seconds to scan a 35mm frame at 12, dpi. The problem with most dedicated film scanners is you have to stick around to manually load each frame of film to be scanned.

The beauty of the OpticFilm is its motorized film transport automatically advances a strip of six 35mm film frames or four 35mm slides through the scanner. The process is complete in just 3 minutes 20 seconds when scanning negs at 3,dpi, though unlike the cheaper OpticFilm , this is the highest resolution available. However it offers fewer pre-scan customization options than the old SilverFast software and is somewhat lacking if you want total scanning control. Scan quality is also disappointing compared to the older OpticFilm You also may find yourself unimpressed with the muted default contrast and slightly inaccurate colors.

If you have a lot of 35mm film to batch scan, the Pacific Image PowerFilm Scanner is the way to get the job done. It's a beast of a scanner that does basically one job but does it exceptionally well and efficiently. These models also feature a feed that moves frames through the scanner for you. How many frames the scanner holds varies by the make and model.

The Plustek offers good resolution and includes easy-to-use software that lets you preview scans without additional applications. The Plustek OpticFilm i AI includes a dpi optical resolution although max resolution scans can take up to two minutes. This model is more specific in what it scans, which includes only 35mm film and 35mm mounted slides. This software lets you preview, adjust settings, and share and organize files without connecting to additional programs.

Most scanners of this type max out at 35mm film, but some more expensive models will accept medium format. Gone are the days when you need a projector and video camera to convert your old reels into digital format. Film scanners designed for movie reels can now do it for you.

These models convert 8mm and Super 8 film reels into digital videos, which can then be edited or shared. These machines feature a screen to watch the film in action before and during the recording process.

This type only fits reels of certain sizes, so check to make sure that the reels you have are compatible with the machine. While these machines do a great job of transferring visual media, they do not have the capability to record sound. The scanning and conversion process is fairly slow, but if you have a lot of film to convert, this model is far more affordable than having the scanning done professionally. Professionals and photographers who regularly use film may want to invest in a film scanner with a few extras.

Professional-grade models also include film holders of different sizes to accommodate a wider range of film types. It includes film holders for 35mm mounted slides, 35mm film, medium format strips, and 4 x 5 sheet film. You can also run the scanner without using one of the holders. This model features a dual lens system that includes high-resolution and super high-resolution lenses and automatically adjusts them based on the scanning media and resolution selection.